Comments on: Analiese’s Reading 3/24 http://quichemoraine.com/2009/03/analieses-reading-324/ We don't need no stinking subtitle Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:47:45 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Stephanie Zvan http://quichemoraine.com/2009/03/analieses-reading-324/#comment-249 Stephanie Zvan Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:47:30 +0000 http://quichemoraine.com/?p=555#comment-249 Well, yes, but at least we know we'll be able to continue reading about her. :) Well, yes, but at least we know we’ll be able to continue reading about her. :)

]]> By: Stephen Moore http://quichemoraine.com/2009/03/analieses-reading-324/#comment-247 Stephen Moore Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:14:45 +0000 http://quichemoraine.com/?p=555#comment-247 re: Bachmann, them's fightin' words! IANAL, but what she has said comes perilously close to violating <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002383----000-.html" rel="nofollow">18 USC 115 §2383</a> and/or <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002385----000-.html" rel="nofollow">18 USC 115 §2385</a> As alarming as Bachmann is there is still a perverse amusement in one's astonishment at reading about her from antipodean comfort. re: Bachmann, them’s fightin’ words! IANAL, but what she has said comes perilously close to violating 18 USC 115 §2383 and/or 18 USC 115 §2385

As alarming as Bachmann is there is still a perverse amusement in one’s astonishment at reading about her from antipodean comfort.

]]>